As the housing market evolves, many are exploring unconventional pathways to homeownership. Alternative homeownership models, such as shared homeownership and (co)living, offer exciting possibilities for aspiring homeowners. These solutions, however beneficial they might seem, are only as viable as the lenders who are willing to underwrite them. This post delves into three key alternative financing options: home equity agreements, individual financing for Tenancy in Common (TIC) loans, and joint financing or joint mortgages. We will explore the suitability of each model, the ease of access, and the pros and cons to help you make an informed decision.
A home equity agreement (HEA) is an innovative financial tool where homeowners sell a portion of their home’s future appreciation in exchange for cash today. Similar to how tech startups raise money from venture capitalists HEAs are not like traditional loans in that they don't require monthly repayments or interest. The flip side is that you are agreeing to give the lender a significant percentage of the proceeds when the home is sold which, if the property appreciates significantly, could far outweigh the original cash you received. HEAs are best suited for homeowners who need liquidity without increasing their debt burden. And while access to HEAs can be relatively straightforward, depending on the home’s equity and the homeowner’s financial profile the cost of capital is often times quite high relative to other lending options.
Accessibility: HEAs can be relatively straightforward to access, depending on the home's equity and the homeowner’s financial profile.
Pros:
Cons:
Individual financing for Tenancy in Common (TIC) loans involves each (co)owner securing their own mortgage. This model suits buyers who want to (co)own property while maintaining financial independence. Accessibility varies based on individual creditworthiness and income. The primary advantage is that each owner is responsible only for their mortgage, protecting against financial issues of other (co)owners. However, the process can be complex, as lenders may require more stringent qualifications. Additionally, each owner’s financial troubles could complicate property management and resale.
Accessibility: Varies based on individual creditworthiness and income but is less common than joint mortgages and comparable to home equity agreements.
Pros:
Cons:
Joint financing or joint mortgages involve all (co)owners applying for a single mortgage. This model is ideal for buyers of a similar financial situation who are looking to pool their resources to purchase a property. Access is often easier than individual TIC financing since combined incomes can meet lender requirements more effectively. Joint financings allow (co)buyers to afford more expensive properties while simplifying loan management. The risks however is that all(co)owners are jointly liable for the mortgage, meaning if one defaults, the others must cover the payments. This shared liability can lead to financial strain and potential conflicts among (co)owners.
Accessibility: Easier to access than individual TIC financing (major lenders will underwrite in many instances) due to combined incomes.
Pros:
Cons:
Choosing the right financing option is crucial for the success of alternative homeownership models. Home equity agreements offer flexibility without monthly payments but are typically designed for a single homeowner, individual TIC loans provide financial independence, and joint mortgages allow for greater purchasing power through combined resources. By understanding the benefits and challenges of each option, you can make a decision that aligns with your financial goals and homeownership aspirations.
At Tomi, we specialize in navigating these unique pathways to homeownership, helping you create the life you want with the people you want in it.
